Printable version (PDF, 5 MB)
March 31, 2019
Table of Contents
- 1.1. Foreward
- 1.2. Explanatory Notes
- 1.3. Convention Refugee Definition
- 1.3.1.
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S. 96 - Meaning of “Convention Refugee”
- 1.3.2.
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Section 108(1) and (4)- Rejection and Cessation
- 1.3.3.
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S. 98 – Exclusion Clauses
- 1.3.4. Schedule to the
Immigration And Refugee Protection Act - Exclusion Clauses
- 1.3.5. What the Paper Covers
- 1.4. General Rules of Interpretation
- 1.4.1. Surrogate Protection
- 1.4.2. Fear of Persecution for a Convention Reason
- 1.4.3. Two Presumptions at Play in Refugee Determination
- 1.4.4. State Complicity Not Required
- 1.4.5. Existence of Fear of Persecution
- 1.4.6. Use of Underlying Anti-Discrimination Law in Interpreting Particular Social Group
- 1.4.7. Broad and General Interpretation of Political Opinion and Perception of Persecutor
- 1.4.8. Examiner to Consider the Relevant Grounds
- 1.4.9. Section 7 of the
Charter
- 1.4.10. All Elements of the Definition Must be Met
- 1.4.11. Personal Targeting Not Required
- 1.4.12. Applicable Test: “Reasonable or Serious Possibility”
- 1.4.13. Exclusion Clauses
- 1.4.14. International Human Rights Instruments
1.5. Table of Cases
- 2.1. Country of Nationality
- 2.1.1. Multiple Nationalities
- 2.1.2. Establishing Nationality
- 2.1.3. Right to Citizenship
- 2.1.3.1. Israel’s Law of Return
- 2.1.4. Effectiveness of Nationality
- 2.1.5. Failure to Access Possible Protection in a Third Country
- 2.2. Former Habitual Residence - Stateless Persons
- 2.2.1. Principles and Criteria for Establishing Country of Former Habitual Residence
- 2.2.2. Multiple Countries of Former Habitual Residence
- 2.2.3. Nature of Ties to the Country
- 2.2.4. Subsisting Well-Founded Fear of Persecution
- 2.2.5. Evidence of Persecution for a Convention Reason
- 2.2.6. State Protection
- 2.3. Table of Cases
- 3.1. Generally
- 3.1.1. Definition and General Principles
- 3.1.1.1. Serious Harm
- 3.1.1.2. Repetition and Persistence
- 3.1.1.3. Nexus
- 3.1.1.4. Common Crime or Persecution?
- 3.1.1.5. Agent of Persecution
- 3.1.2. Cumulative Acts of Discrimination and/or Harassment
- 3.1.3. Forms of Persecution
- 3.1.3.1. Some Judicial Observations
- 3.2. Table of Cases
- 4.1. Generally
- 4.2. Race
- 4.3. Nationality
- 4.4. Religion
- 4.5. Particular Social Group
- 4.6. Political Opinion
- 4.7. Victims of Criminality and Nexus to Grounds
- 4.8. Table of Cases
- 5.1. Generally
- 5.2. Test - Standard of Proof
- 5.3. Subjective Fear and Objective Basis
- 5.3.1. Establishing the Subjective and Objective Elements
- 5.4. Delay
- 5.4.1. Delay in Leaving the Country of Persecution
- 5.4.2. Failure to Seek Protection in Other Countries
- 5.4.3. Delay in Making a Claim Upon Arrival in Canada
- 5.5. Re-Availment of Protection
- 5.6. Sur Place Claims and Well-Founded Fear
- 5.7. Table of Cases
- 6.1. Introduction - General Principles
- 6.1.1. Surrogate Protection
- 6.1.2. Multiple Nationalities
- 6.1.3. Timing of Analysis
- 6.1.4. Unable or Unwilling - A Blurred Distinction - No Requirement for State Complicity
- 6.1.5. Presumptions
- 6.1.6. Nexus
- 6.1.7. Burden and Standard of Proof and Rebutting the Presumption
- 6.1.7.1 Burden of Proof and Obligation to Approach the State
- 6.1.7.1.1. More Than One Authority in the Country
- 6.1.7.2 Standard of Proof
- 6.1.7.3 Rebutting the Presumption of Protection
- 6.1.7.3.1 The Evidentiary Burden of “Clear and Convincing”
- 6.1.7.3.2. Standard of Protection
- 6.1.8. Source of Protection
- 6.2. Stateless Claimants
- 6.3. Table of Cases
- 7.1. Change of Circumstances
- 7.1.1. Standard of Proof and Criteria
- 7.1.2. Reasons and Assessment of Evidence
- 7.1.3. Post-Hearing Evidence
- 7.2. Compelling Reasons
- 7.2.1. Applicability
- 7.2.2. Duty to Consider the “Compelling Reasons” Exception
- 7.2.3. Meaning of “Compelling Reasons”
- 7.2.4. Adequacy of Reasons for Decision
- 7.2.5. Level or Severity of Harm
- 7.2.6. Psychological After-Effects
- 7.2.7. Persecution of Others and Other Factors
- 7.3.
Sur Place Claims
- 7.3.1. Claimant’s Activities Abroad
- 7.4. Table of Cases
- 8.1. The Two-Prong Test and General Principles
- 8.2. Notice - Burden of Proof
- 8.3. Interpretation and Application of the Two-Pronged Test
- 8.3.1. Fear of Persecution
- 8.3.2. Reasonable in All the Circumstances
- 8.4. Table of Cases
- 9.1. Introduction
- 9.2. Civil War or Other Prevalent Conflict
- 9.2.1. Two Approaches: Comparative and Non-Comparative
- 9.2.1.1. Background
- 9.2.1.2. The Non-Comparative Approach is the Legal and Preferred Test
- 9.3. Prosecution, or Persecution for a Convention Reason?
- 9.3.1. Limits to Acceptable Legislation and Enforcement
- 9.3.2. Laws of General Application
- 9.3.3. Policing Methods, National Security and Preservation of Social Order
- 9.3.4. Enforcement and Serious Possibility
- 9.3.5. Exit Laws
- 9.3.6. Military Service: Conscientious Objection, Evasion, Desertion
- 9.3.7. One-Child Policy of China
- 9.3.8. Religious or Cultural Mores
- 9.3.8.1. Restrictions Upon Women
- 9.3.8.2. Ahmadis from Pakistan
- 9.4. Indirect Persecution and Family Unity
- 9.5. Table of Cases
- 10.1. Introduction
- 10.1.1. Test
- 10.1.2. Nature of the Residency Rights
- 10.1.3. Onus -
Prima facie evidence
- 10.1.4. Onus to Renew Status
- 10.1.5. Access to obtain a Status Substantially Similar to Nationals
- 10.1.6. Rights and Obligations of a National
- 10.1.7. Fear of Persecution and State Protection in the Article 1E Country
- 10.2. Table of Cases
- 11.1. Introduction
- 11.1.1. Standard of Proof - Serious Reasons to Consider
- 11.1.2. Balancing and Complicity Generally
- 11.2. Article 1F(a): Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity
- 11.2.1. Crimes Against Peace
- 11.2.2. War Crimes
- 11.2.3. Crimes Against Humanity
- 11.2.4. Defences
- 11.2.4.1. Duress
- 11.2.4.2. Superior Orders
- 11.2.4.3. Military Necessity
- 11.2.4.4. Remorse
- 11.2.5. Complicity
- 11.2.5.1. The Test for Complicity
- 11.2.5.2. Applying the Test
- 11.2.6. Responsibility of Superiors
- 11.3. Article 1 F(b): Serious Non-Political Crimes
- 11.3.1. Generally
- 11.3.2. No Requirement for “Equivalency”
- 11.3.3. Determination of Whether a Crime is Serious
- 11.3.4. Determination of Whether a Crime is Political
- 11.3.5. Prior to Admission
- 11.3.6. “Serious Reasons for Considering”
- 11.4. Article 1F(c): Acts Contrary to the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations
- 11.5. Burden of Proof and Notice
- 11.6. Consideration of Inclusion Where Claimant is Excluded
- 11.7. Table of Cases
- 12.1. Introduction
- 12.2. Legislative Framework
- 12.2.1. Reforms to Cessation regime - 2012
- 12.2.2. Overview of Cessation Provisions in IRPA
- 12.3. Jurisdiction to Decide Applications to Cease - Refugee status conferred by s. 95(1)
- 12.4. Procedure
- 12.4.1. Responsible Minister
- 12.4.2. How an Application is Made
- 12.4.3. Order of Questioning
- 12.4.3. Language of Proceedings
- 12.5. Interpretation of the Grounds
- 12.5.1. Burden and Standard of Proof
- 12.5.2. General Principles
- 12.5.3. Paragraph 108(1)(a) - Reavailment
- 12.5.3.1. Voluntariness
- 12.5.3.2. Intention
- 12.5.3.2.1. Minors
- 12.5.3.2.1. Presumption from obtaining a passport
- 12.5.3.2.1. Application of the presumption in the case law
- 12.5.3.3. Actual Reavailment
- 12.5.4. Paragraph 108(1)(b) - Voluntary acquisition of nationality
- 12.5.5. Paragraph 108(1)(c) - Acquisition of a new nationality
- 12.5.6. Paragraph 108(1)(d) - Re-establishment
- 12.5.7. Paragraph 108(1)(e) - Change of Circumstances
- 12.6. Other Issues
- 12.6.1. Discretion to consider which grounds apply
- 12.6.2. Relevance of future risk
- 12.6.3. Relevance of humanitarian and compassionate considerations
- 12.6.4. Abuse of process and similar arguments
- 12.6.5. Constitutionality of Cessation Provisions
- 12.7. Table of Cases
- 13.1. Introduction
- 13.2. Legislative Framework
- 13.2.1. Historical Context
- 13.2.2. Current Legislation
- 13.3. Jurisdiction of the refugee protection division
- 13.4. Procedure
- 13.4.1. Responsible Minister
- 13.4.2. How the Application is Made
- 13.4.3. Order of Questioning
- 13.4.4. Language of Proceedings
- 13.4.5. Protected Person as Witness
- 13.4.6. Member as Witness
- 13.4.7. Rule Requirements
- 13.5. Interpretation of section 109
- 13.5.1. Burden and Standard of Proof
- 13.5.2. Overview of Analytical Framework – Two-Step Analysis
- 13.5.3. What Evidence Is Admissible at Each Step of the Analysis?
- 13.5.4. Issues Related to Subsection 109(1) – Misrepresentation
- 13.5.4.1. Materiality
- 13.5.4.2. Direct versus Indirect Misrepresentation or Omission
- 13.5.4.3. Intention
- 13.5.4.4. Credibility and Weighing Evidence
- 13.5.5. Issues Related to Subsection 109(2) – Other Evidence Considered at the First Determination Justifying Protection
- 13.5.4.1. Assessing the Remaining Evidence
- 13.5.4.2. Exclusion
- 13.5.4.3. Which Law Should Apply
- 13.6. Other Issues
- 13.6.1. Section 7 of the
Charter
- 13.6.2.
Res Judicata/Second Application
- 13.6.3. Abuse of Process Arguments
- 13.7. Table of Cases